# Highest Rated Datacenter Proxy Providers

Datacenter proxy providers ranked by public Trustpilot and Capterra review scores.

Source: https://proxycompare.io/highest-rated-datacenter-proxies/
Figures quoted for protected targets at 250,000 pages a month.
Success rates and latency on this site are estimates rather than measured results. Prices are taken from each provider's published pricing page.
Proxy Compare is run by Scrape.do, which is shown at the top of every list. No other provider pays for placement or ranking.

Datacenter providers ranked by their public review scores. In this category reviews tend to concentrate on two things: how stable the pool is over time, and how quickly support responds when a subnet starts getting blocked. Both matter more than they sound, because a datacenter pool that degrades quietly costs you a month of bad data before anyone notices.

As with every rating on this site, the score is reproduced from the review platform rather than generated by us, and the review count is shown so you can judge how much weight it carries. Where a provider has no published score, it appears at the bottom of the list rather than being ranked on an assumption.

## Ranking

| # | Provider | Billing | List price / 1k | Success rate | Effective / 1k delivered | Rating |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Scrape.do | Per successful request | $0.11 | 97.8% (est.) | $0.11 | 4.8/5 (69 on trustpilot) |
| 2 | Rayobyte | Per GB or per IP | $0.25 | 74.5% (est.) | $0.34 | 4.1/5 (142 on trustpilot) |
| 3 | Webshare | Per GB or per IP | $0.15 | 71.2% (est.) | $0.20 | 4.0/5 (1432 on trustpilot) |

Effective cost is the list price divided by the share of requests that come back with usable HTML. A bandwidth plan bills blocked responses, a per request plan does not.

## How to read datacenter proxy reviews

### What reviewers in this category talk about

Datacenter proxy reviews have a different character from residential ones, because the product is simpler and the failure modes are different.

Pool stability dominates. The recurring complaint is a pool that worked well for a month and then degraded, usually because the provider's ranges accumulated enough block-list presence to stop clearing targets. This matters more than it sounds: a datacenter pool that degrades quietly costs you a month of incomplete data before anyone looks at the success rate.

Support responsiveness is the second theme, and it is closely tied to the first. When a subnet starts getting blocked, the question is whether the provider moves you to fresh ranges quickly or tells you that everything looks fine on their end.

Value comes third. Because prices in this category are low, reviewers are less exercised about cost than in residential, and more about whether the allowance and concurrency limits matched what they expected.

### Interpreting the score

Read the number alongside the review count, both of which appear on every card here along with the source platform and the date we read it. Datacenter providers often serve a broader customer base than scraping teams — VPN users, ad verification, general privacy customers — so a score can reflect experiences quite different from yours.

That breadth cuts both ways. It means a larger sample and a more stable number, but it also dilutes the signal about the thing you care about, which is whether the pool holds up against defended targets over time.

### What to look for beyond the number

Recency is worth more than the average in this category. A pool's condition changes; a strong score built over three years tells you less than a pattern in the last quarter. If a provider's recent reviews mention degradation and the older ones do not, that is a live signal regardless of what the overall score says.

Where a provider has no published score, it appears at the bottom of this list rather than being ranked on an assumption. Absence of reviews is not evidence of anything, and we would rather show a gap than invent a number to fill it.