Scrape.doBest value
Rotating proxy and scraping API behind a single endpoint
4.869 reviewsTrustpilot
Every figure on this page is quoted for protected targets: Cloudflare, Akamai and DataDome, login walls, moderate rate limits and some JS rendering.
Assuming an average page weight of 480 KB and counting every blocked response that a bandwidth plan still bills.
Rotating proxy and scraping API behind a single endpoint
4.869 reviewsTrustpilot
The cheapest headline number in the table
4.01,432 reviewsTrustpilot
Fast and cheap until a WAF is involved
4.1142 reviewsTrustpilot
Traffic that does not expire, useful for bursty jobs
Cheap per gigabyte, slow per request
3.331 reviewsTrustpilot
The best price to quality ratio among bandwidth plans
4.22,091 reviewsTrustpilot
Consent documentation is the strongest in the set
3.71 reviewTrustpilot
Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.2110 reviewsTrustpilot
Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.1469 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Trial Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.59 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Pay As You Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.56 reviewsTrustpilot
Request in, HTML out, with credit multipliers for hard targets
4.542 reviewsTrustpilot
Routes a single API across 20+ upstream vendors
4.410 reviewsTrustpilot
Separate token types for plain and JS requests
4.013 reviewsTrustpilot
The most granular filtering controls in this group
3.4149 reviewsTrustpilot
ISP backed addresses with unusually stable sessions
3.795 reviewsTrustpilot
Generous free tier, low concurrency ceilings
5.09 reviewsCapterra
Enterprise network with negotiated contracts
4.0766 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.214 reviewsTrustpilot
The largest network on the market, priced like it
4.31,022 reviewsTrustpilot
Proxy layer inside a broader automation platform
4.8753 reviewsTrustpilot
Ban aware routing with automatic extraction add-ons
4.443 reviewsCapterra
Scraping API with a separate anti-bot bypass flag
4.7103 reviewsCapterra
Micro Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.858 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential + Mobile 2GB PAYG Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.7116 reviewsTrustpilot
Crawl to markdown, aimed at language model pipelines
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.6188 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.6200 reviewsTrustpilot
Developer first API with rendering on by default
Residential Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.5107 reviewsTrustpilot
Carrier grade NAT makes blocks rare and bytes expensive
4.5107 reviewsTrustpilot
200 Residential IPs Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.2839 reviewsTrustpilot
Same workload, ten cheapest providers in the current selection. The gap between a headline price and a delivered page widens sharply as targets get harder.
This is the full list, across every proxy type and billing model we track. Providers here fall into two commercial models that are easy to confuse. Bandwidth plans charge for every byte transferred, including the bytes in blocked responses. Per-request plans charge only for requests that succeed, which means retries cost you nothing and the list price is already the real price.
The distinction changes the answer more than any feature comparison will. On a bandwidth plan your cost rises as your success rate falls, so a provider with a weaker success rate quietly costs more than its price sheet suggests. On a per-request plan it does not. The ranking below accounts for this, which is why the order here often differs from a straight price comparison.
Everything on this page is sold as "proxies", but there are really three different products underneath, and they suit different teams.
A proxy list hands you a set of addresses and leaves the rest to you. You build the rotation, detect the bans, retire dead addresses, manage headers and user agents. It is the cheapest per unit and the most work, and it makes sense when your targets are easy or your volume is enormous.
A rotating pool gives you one endpoint and handles address selection on its side. You still manage headers, sessions and retry logic, but not the pool itself. This is how most residential and mobile access is sold today.
A smart proxy or scraping API takes the whole problem. You send a URL; it handles rotation, headers, challenge solving and retries, and returns the page. Most of these bill only for successful requests.
Two models, and the difference matters more than any feature comparison.
Bandwidth billing charges for every byte transferred, whether or not the response was useful. Block pages, challenge scripts, redirect chains and empty results all consume your allowance at full rate. Your real cost per delivered page therefore rises as your success rate falls, which means the advertised price is a floor rather than a total.
Per-request billing charges only for successful responses. Retries are free, failures cost nothing, and the quoted price is the price you pay. This is why the ranking on this page frequently differs from a straight price comparison: on a per-request plan a higher list price can produce a lower real cost.
Start with the cheapest thing that works and move up only when it stops working.
For targets with no meaningful bot defence, datacenter proxies at a fraction of a dollar per gigabyte are hard to beat. For targets that filter hosting ranges but do not run serious detection, a smart proxy on a datacenter backend usually clears them. For commercially defended targets — retail, travel, marketplaces — residential becomes necessary. For targets that defeat residential, or for mobile-first platforms, mobile is the remaining option.
Skipping straight to the expensive end because it is more likely to work is the most common and most costly mistake in this market.
Concurrency limits, because a generous allowance behind a low concurrency cap cannot be used at speed. Geographic coverage at the granularity you need, since country-level targeting is standard and city or carrier targeting often is not. Session control, if any part of your work involves logins or multi-step flows. And whether unused capacity expires, which for variable workloads can outweigh the unit price.
Success rate and latency figures published anywhere in this market, including here, should be treated as estimates unless they come with a stated methodology and sample size. Vendors measure their own products against their own targets. The only figure that is definitely about your workload is the one you measure yourself, against your own target, during a trial. Every provider on this page can be tested for a small amount of money, and that test is worth more than any published comparison.