Scrape.doBest value
Rotating proxy and scraping API behind a single endpoint
4.869 reviewsTrustpilot
Every figure on this page is quoted for protected targets: Cloudflare, Akamai and DataDome, login walls, moderate rate limits and some JS rendering.
Assuming an average page weight of 480 KB and counting every blocked response that a bandwidth plan still bills.
Rotating proxy and scraping API behind a single endpoint
4.869 reviewsTrustpilot
Micro Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.858 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.6200 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.6188 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.5107 reviewsTrustpilot
The largest network on the market, priced like it
4.31,022 reviewsTrustpilot
The best price to quality ratio among bandwidth plans
4.22,091 reviewsTrustpilot
Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.2110 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.214 reviewsTrustpilot
200 Residential IPs Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.2839 reviewsTrustpilot
Enterprise network with negotiated contracts
4.0766 reviewsTrustpilot
ISP backed addresses with unusually stable sessions
3.795 reviewsTrustpilot
Consent documentation is the strongest in the set
3.71 reviewTrustpilot
Residential + Mobile 2GB PAYG Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.7116 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Trial Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.59 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Pay As You Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.56 reviewsTrustpilot
The most granular filtering controls in this group
3.4149 reviewsTrustpilot
Cheap per gigabyte, slow per request
3.331 reviewsTrustpilot
Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.1469 reviewsTrustpilot
Traffic that does not expire, useful for bursty jobs
Same workload, ten cheapest providers in the current selection. The gap between a headline price and a delivered page widens sharply as targets get harder.
This page ranks residential providers by their public review scores on Trustpilot and Capterra. Each card shows the score, the number of reviews behind it and which platform it came from, along with the date we read it. Review data is the only performance signal on this site that comes from an independent third party rather than from a vendor's own claims.
Read the review count alongside the score. A 5.0 from nine reviewers tells you much less than a 4.4 from seven hundred, and small samples in this market move quickly. Scores also reflect the whole customer experience — billing, support, documentation — rather than raw proxy performance, so treat them as one input rather than the deciding one.
Almost every performance number in this market originates with the vendor. Success rates, pool sizes, uptime figures — all of it is self-reported, usually without a stated methodology, and all of it is marketing until proven otherwise.
Public review scores are different in one important way: they come from customers rather than from the company, on a platform the company does not control. That does not make them precise, but it makes them independent, which is rarer here than it should be.
Read a few hundred of them and the same themes recur, and most of them are not about IP quality.
Billing is the largest category by some distance: unexpected charges, bandwidth counted differently than expected, difficulty cancelling, balance expiring without warning. Support is the second: response times, whether the first reply was a template, whether anyone escalated. Onboarding is the third, and in this category that increasingly means identity verification — several residential providers require a compliance check before releasing access, and reviewers who did not expect it react strongly.
Actual network performance appears less often than you would expect, and when it does it is usually target-specific: a pool that worked on one site and failed on another. That is genuinely useful information, but only if their target resembles yours.
The review count matters as much as the score. A 5.0 from nine reviewers and a 4.4 from seven hundred are not comparable claims; the first could move a full point next month. Every card here shows both figures, plus the platform the score came from and the date we read it.
Scores also concentrate at the extremes. People write reviews when something goes badly wrong or when support rescued them, and rarely when a service simply works. A score in the high threes in this market often reflects a functioning product with a billing system that annoys people, not a broken network.
Whether the pool clears your target. That is the only question that determines whether the provider is any use to you, and no review score answers it, because it depends on a target the reviewer was not scraping.
Use the rating to filter out providers with systemic billing or support problems — that signal is real and worth acting on. Then test the survivors against your own target before deciding. The rating tells you what it is like to be a customer; only your own trial tells you whether the product works for your job.