Scrape.doBest value
Rotating proxy and scraping API behind a single endpoint
4.869 reviewsTrustpilot
Every figure on this page is quoted for protected targets: Cloudflare, Akamai and DataDome, login walls, moderate rate limits and some JS rendering.
Assuming an average page weight of 480 KB and counting every blocked response that a bandwidth plan still bills.
Rotating proxy and scraping API behind a single endpoint
4.869 reviewsTrustpilot
The cheapest headline number in the table
4.01,432 reviewsTrustpilot
Fast and cheap until a WAF is involved
4.1142 reviewsTrustpilot
Traffic that does not expire, useful for bursty jobs
Cheap per gigabyte, slow per request
3.331 reviewsTrustpilot
The best price to quality ratio among bandwidth plans
4.22,091 reviewsTrustpilot
Consent documentation is the strongest in the set
3.71 reviewTrustpilot
Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.2110 reviewsTrustpilot
Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.1469 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Trial Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.59 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Pay As You Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.56 reviewsTrustpilot
Request in, HTML out, with credit multipliers for hard targets
4.542 reviewsTrustpilot
Routes a single API across 20+ upstream vendors
4.410 reviewsTrustpilot
The most granular filtering controls in this group
3.4149 reviewsTrustpilot
Separate token types for plain and JS requests
4.013 reviewsTrustpilot
ISP backed addresses with unusually stable sessions
3.795 reviewsTrustpilot
Enterprise network with negotiated contracts
4.0766 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.214 reviewsTrustpilot
Generous free tier, low concurrency ceilings
5.09 reviewsCapterra
The largest network on the market, priced like it
4.31,022 reviewsTrustpilot
Proxy layer inside a broader automation platform
4.8753 reviewsTrustpilot
Ban aware routing with automatic extraction add-ons
4.443 reviewsCapterra
Scraping API with a separate anti-bot bypass flag
4.7103 reviewsCapterra
Micro Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.858 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential + Mobile 2GB PAYG Plan, rotating proxy pool
3.7116 reviewsTrustpilot
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.6188 reviewsTrustpilot
Crawl to markdown, aimed at language model pipelines
Residential Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.6200 reviewsTrustpilot
Developer first API with rendering on by default
Residential Pay-As-You-Go Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.5107 reviewsTrustpilot
Carrier grade NAT makes blocks rare and bytes expensive
4.5107 reviewsTrustpilot
200 Residential IPs Plan, rotating proxy pool
4.2839 reviewsTrustpilot
Same workload, ten cheapest providers in the current selection. The gap between a headline price and a delivered page widens sharply as targets get harder.
The full list sorted by list price, across residential, datacenter and mobile. Because the categories have very different cost structures, the top of this list is dominated by datacenter plans and per-request APIs with low entry tiers. That is useful for understanding the shape of the market, less useful for choosing a provider, since the cheapest option is only relevant if it can actually reach your targets.
Narrow by proxy type first, then compare within that type. A datacenter plan and a mobile plan are not competing for the same job, and ranking them against each other on price alone will always favour the one that would get blocked.
This page puts datacenter, residential and mobile in one list, which makes the range look extreme — fractions of a cent per gigabyte at one end, tens of dollars at the other. The spread is not inconsistency. It reflects what each category costs the provider to supply.
Datacenter addresses are a commodity bought in blocks and racked on servers. Residential addresses are borrowed from real consumer connections and the provider pays for every gigabyte. Mobile addresses sit behind physical SIM cards on paid carrier plans. The prices follow the supply costs almost exactly.
A price is only meaningful against a target. The cheapest plan on this page is an excellent choice for a public registry and completely useless against a defended retail site, where every request would be blocked and every blocked request still billed.
So the sequence that works is: decide which proxy type your target requires, then compare prices within that type. Sorting the whole market by price and starting at the top produces a plan that cannot do the job, which is the most expensive outcome available.
The unit rate is the advertised figure, per gigabyte or per thousand requests.
The included allowance turns that rate into a monthly bill, and is where most comparison errors happen. A cheaper plan with a smaller allowance is frequently more expensive per unit, particularly at entry tiers where providers price for accessibility rather than value.
The success rate turns the bill into a cost per delivered page. On bandwidth plans this is the largest variable in the whole calculation, and the one no price sheet mentions. A pool that fails a third of your requests costs fifty percent more per usable page than its rate suggests.
Much of the low end of this market is promotional: introductory discounts, first-deposit matches, capped rates that revert past a volume threshold. These are worth taking and worth knowing the expiry of.
Volume tiers move in the other direction. Nearly every provider drops the unit rate substantially as you commit to more, and the gap between the entry rate and the largest tier is routinely three or four times. If your volume is stable, pricing the committed tier is usually a bigger saving than switching providers.
Pick the two or three providers that fit your proxy type and budget. Buy the smallest amount each allows. Run your real target through all of them and measure your own success rate. Then compare cost per delivered page using your own figures.
That takes an afternoon and a few dollars, and it replaces every published comparison — including this one — with data that is actually about your workload.